*
* * Return to Homepage * Home * Index * Help * Enquiries *
*
*
*
* Login
* Return to Homepage *
*
* * *
* CES
*
*
*
*
* Latest News
*
* December 2008
*
* November 2008
*
* October 2008
*
* September 2008
*
* August 2008
*
* July 2008
*
* June 2008
*
* May 2008
*
* April 2008
*
* March 2008
*
* February 2008
*
* January 2008
*
* December 2007
*
* November 2007
*
* October 2007
*
* September 2007
*
* August 2007
*
* July 2007
*
* June 2007
*
* May 2007
*
* April 2007
*
* March 2007
*
* February 2007
*
* January 2007
*
* December 2006
*
* November 2006
*
* October 2006
*
* September 2006
*
* August 2006
*
* July 2006
*
* June 2006
*
* May 2006
*
* April 2006
*
* March 2006
*
* February 2006
*
* January 2006
*
* December 2005
*
* November 2005
*
* October 2005
*
* September 2005
*
* CES Parliamentary Reception 11th June 2008
*
* Community cohesion conference for faith school specialist sports colleges (16th July 2008)
*
* National Catholic Education Conference, 8th-9th May 2007
*
* Media Monitoring Bulletins 2007-2008
*
* Events Diary 2007-2008
*
* Consultation Responses
*
* Briefings
*
*
* *
Back to news

Alternative White Paper Proposals
*

The Catholic Education Service believes that the publication of Shaping the Education Bill: Reaching for Consensus is an important and welcome step. It is clear that the authors and supporters of the report are genuine in their support for state education and in their attempts to improve the proposals in the White Paper:

 

 

“The fundamental concerns of many colleagues centre around the potential for pupils from poorer areas being disadvantaged as popular schools expand, and wealthier and better informed parents are able to set up their own schools operating their own admissions policies. There is also concern that education policy should remain democratically accountable.”

 

We welcome their call for the government to re-examine and clarify the nature and role of Trusts and local authorities. We have constantly stressed that the governance arrangements for voluntary aided schools are not a sufficient condition for their success, and that replicating them for the wider community sector will not ensure that new Trust schools have the values and ethos which parents appreciate in Catholic schools.

 

However, we would like to repeat our opposition to making the admissions Code of Practice statutory as proposed in Shaping the Education Bill. Instead, we agree with Philip Hunter, the Chief Adjudicator, who said, “It wouldn’t be possible to translate the whole of the Code into regulation”. We are also concerned at the paper’s suggestion that local authorities need to have identical powers for different categories of school. Different governance and management arrangements makes this unnecessary.

 

The CES continues to consult with its partners, and to engage in a positive dialogue with ministers and officials. We hope that this period of consultation will be used by the government to improve its proposals before they are published as a Bill in 2006.

*
*
*
* Downloads *
*
*
*
>
Shaping the Education Bill
*
*
*
*
* *Website by Baigent *Terms & Conditions*Privacy Policy*Page Top *
*
*