*
* * Return to Homepage * Home * Index * Help * Enquiries *
*
*
*
* Login
* Return to Homepage *
*
* * *
* CES
*
*
*
*
* Latest News
*
* December 2008
*
* November 2008
*
* October 2008
*
* September 2008
*
* August 2008
*
* July 2008
*
* June 2008
*
* May 2008
*
* April 2008
*
* March 2008
*
* February 2008
*
* January 2008
*
* December 2007
*
* November 2007
*
* October 2007
*
* September 2007
*
* August 2007
*
* July 2007
*
* June 2007
*
* May 2007
*
* April 2007
*
* March 2007
*
* February 2007
*
* January 2007
*
* December 2006
*
* November 2006
*
* October 2006
*
* September 2006
*
* August 2006
*
* July 2006
*
* June 2006
*
* May 2006
*
* April 2006
*
* March 2006
*
* February 2006
*
* January 2006
*
* December 2005
*
* November 2005
*
* October 2005
*
* September 2005
*
* CES Parliamentary Reception 11th June 2008
*
* Community cohesion conference for faith school specialist sports colleges (16th July 2008)
*
* National Catholic Education Conference, 8th-9th May 2007
*
* Media Monitoring Bulletins 2007-2008
*
* Events Diary 2007-2008
*
* Consultation Responses
*
* Briefings
*
*
* *
Back to news

CES statement on sex and relationships education (27th August 2008)
*

PRESS RELEASE

27th August 2008

Public Discussion on the Current Place of Sex and Relationships Education (SRE) in National Education: A CES Comment

There is rightly a great deal of interest in what Personal, Social and Health Education (PSHE) is provided by schools.  Many interest groups are taking the impending report of the ministerial-led group reviewing Sex and Relationships Education (SRE) as an opportunity for them to air their views and to lobby accordingly.

What should be noted from many of the statements made by lobbyists and others, including parliamentarians, is that they are calling for more teaching about relationships and the social and emotional aspects of SRE; this would be a positive development.  Aspects of this are applicable to education from the early years as are some facts about the body and human biology so calls from some quarters to restrict SRE to secondary age pupils are unrealistic.

The Catholic Church does, however, expect that SRE should be taught in line with the ethos and values of the school and therefore we support the existing right of Governing Bodies to determine the school’s SRE policy and we would strongly oppose any action which would sexualise children, or promote sexual activity outside the context of married relationships.  We understand that if children and young people are to avoid exploitation whether by their peers or others, it is necessary for them to have accurate factual information on many sensitive matters and to be able to discuss them in a sound educational or family setting.  

We are convinced of the importance of parents and carers as the foremost educators of their children and their views must be taken into account in planning and providing SRE.  Parents and carers may well need more practical help to support their children in their personal development; too often parents and carers may abdicate this role because of lack of confidence.  We hope that more attention will be paid to assisting them in this aspect of their children’s growth.  This would match well with the aims of Every Child Matters and the Children’s Plan in the delivery of Well Being Targets.

ENDS

Oona Stannard

Chief Executive and Director

Catholic Education Service for England and Wales

*
*
* Links *
*
*
*
>
CES response to Ofsted report on PSHE (12th April 2007)
* *
*
*
*
*
* *Website by Baigent *Terms & Conditions*Privacy Policy*Page Top *
*
*