*
* * Return to Homepage * Home * Index * Help * Enquiries *
*
*
*
* Login
* Return to Homepage *
*
* * *
* CES
*
*
*
*
* Latest News
*
* December 2008
*
* November 2008
*
* October 2008
*
* September 2008
*
* August 2008
*
* July 2008
*
* June 2008
*
* May 2008
*
* April 2008
*
* March 2008
*
* February 2008
*
* January 2008
*
* December 2007
*
* November 2007
*
* October 2007
*
* September 2007
*
* August 2007
*
* July 2007
*
* June 2007
*
* May 2007
*
* April 2007
*
* March 2007
*
* February 2007
*
* January 2007
*
* December 2006
*
* November 2006
*
* October 2006
*
* September 2006
*
* August 2006
*
* July 2006
*
* June 2006
*
* May 2006
*
* April 2006
*
* March 2006
*
* February 2006
*
* January 2006
*
* December 2005
*
* November 2005
*
* October 2005
*
* September 2005
*
* CES Parliamentary Reception 11th June 2008
*
* Community cohesion conference for faith school specialist sports colleges (16th July 2008)
*
* National Catholic Education Conference, 8th-9th May 2007
*
* Media Monitoring Bulletins 2007-2008
*
* Events Diary 2007-2008
*
* Consultation Responses
*
* Briefings
*
*
* *
Back to news

CES statement re: Education & Skills Select Committee report on bullying (26th March 2007)
*

 

Statement issued in response to the House of Commons Education and Skills Committee Third Report of Session 2006-07 on bullying:

                                                                                          

 

We are very clear that all forms of bullying are intolerable, whatever their focus and to whoever they are directed.  We would expect all schools to have tough anti-bullying policies, to monitor these and to keep them under regular review. Such policies need to be supported by professional development and training for all staff.  It is likely that within this overall structure anti-bullying policies will make reference to different types of bullying so that all types of bullying are guarded against.  For example, one person’s colloquial nickname for another pupil could well be perceived as gender harassment or bullying and this would be unacceptable.  Anti-bullying policies may be expected to exemplify particular instances of undesirable behaviour such as this and others in order to achieve clarity of expectation.

 

We agree with the Schools Minister’s sentiments entirely: “(We) do not and will not tolerate bullying in any form, we should not tolerate people not respecting the differences that people have and I think that applies to homophobic bullying, it applies to faith-based bullying, it applies to all forms of bullying in all settings”.  We are pleased to note that no-one should have to endure bullying because of their faith.

 

Fortunately, Catholic schools already have a very good record of avoiding and tackling bullying.  Independent data from Ofsted shows that Catholic schools are more often very successful at protecting pupils from bullying, racism or harassment than other schools*. 

 

What really matters is that schools should have anti-bullying policies which make absolutely clear to all concerned that any form of bullying is intolerable. 

 

 

 

Oona Stannard

Chief Executive and Director

26th March 2007

 

 

 

*55% of Catholic primary schools scored excellent or very good on “freedom from bullying” measures compared with 44% of other schools; the figure at secondary level is 41% for Catholic schools compared with 28% of other schools (Quality and Performance: A Survey of Education in Catholic Schools, 2006).

*
*
* Links *
*
*
*
>
Archbishop Vincent Nichols gives evidence to House of Commons Select Committee on Citizenship education (11th December 2006)
* *
*
*
*
*
* *Website by Baigent *Terms & Conditions*Privacy Policy*Page Top *
*
*